Capio court win against competition authority

The Patent- and Market Court of Appeal has rejected a claim by the Swedish Competition Authority that Capio S:t Görans sjukhus, Sweden’s only privately run hospital, entered into an anti-competitive agreement in connection with a procurement of medical services. The judgment of the Patent- and Market Court of Appeal is an important contribution to the law on anti-competitive agreements, in particular clarifying the conditions under which an agreement may, without assessing the agreement’s effects on the market, be deemed anti-competitive by its very nature (an agreement with an anti-competitive object). The Court accepted Capio’s submission that the scope for finding an agreement anti-competitive by object is strictly limited. No anti-competitive effects had been demonstrated in the case and Capio was consequently acquitted and awarded full compensation for costs.

Capio was represented by Mannheimer Swartling.


This website uses cookies to perform certain functions and help you navigate the site efficiently. A cookie is a text file with a small amount of information that is stored on your device. We share some of the information we obtain through these cookies with third parties. We only use cookies that are necessary for the site to function correctly and they therefore cannot be turned off. For further information, see Information on the use of cookies.